Head-to-head · October 2026
Artlist vs Pexels
Artlist takes Music & SFX, Templates & extras, AI features; Pexels takes Pricing, Library, Photos — and the honest answer still depends on the work: Artlist is solo creators and small teams who want music, footage and templates on one bill — especially music-led edits, while Pexels is prototypes, personal projects, mood films and any work where a missing licence record is an acceptable risk.
Published by Brollvia — a third platform with its own horse in this race, declared up front. Everything below is scored from the same public dataset as our own comparison pages, and the section at the end says where we fit.
Meet the contenders
Artlist — All-in-one creator subscription
A music-first creator bundle: music, SFX, footage, templates and a large AI suite under one Max subscription.
Artlist began as a music licensing service for filmmakers and has grown, tier by tier, into the closest thing the market has to Brollvia's shape: one subscription that bundles royalty-free music, sound effects, stock footage, video templates and LUTs, wrapped in a fast-growing AI toolkit. Its flagship Max plan adds AI video, image and music generation, AI voiceover and avatars, and a Studio product for keeping characters and locations consistent across AI-generated scenes. Reviewers count roughly 60,000 music tracks, 50,000 sound effects, 180,000 footage clips and 20,000 templates — a mid-sized but carefully curated catalogue, positioned on quality and ease rather than raw scale.
Two Artlist features deserve respect from any filmmaker. The first is music depth: Max includes stems, so an editor can rebalance a track or lift the vocal out of a cue, and the catalogue is organised into playlists by mood, genre and use case. The second is Clearlist, which connects to your YouTube channel, monitors uploads and automatically clears the false copyright claims that plague stock-music users — unglamorous, monetisation-saving work that most libraries, Brollvia included, do not yet do for you. Artlist also ships plugins for Premiere Pro, After Effects, Final Cut and DaVinci Resolve, so its media can be pulled into the timeline without a browser round-trip.
Where Artlist's model differs from Brollvia's is openness. There is no documented public API for searching and licensing its catalogue, and the one report of an MCP integration — a secondary source describing Claude-based in-chat generation — is about generating media, not licensing the library, and was not verified on an Artlist page in our research. Licensing proof is account-bound: your coverage lives in your Artlist account rather than behind a public verification anyone can check. And while Max is a strong bundle, its price — $39.99 a month for Pro, before the RAW/LOG upgrade — sits well above Brollvia Pro.
Pexels — Free stock library
The free library done well: genuinely good photos and videos, a beloved free API, and no price at all — with the limits that come with free.
Pexels is what happens when a free library is run with taste. Owned by Canva, it offers millions of photos and videos — its Play Store listing says 3M+ — shot by a large contributor community and curated well above the free-library average, under a simple licence that does not even require attribution. It is the first tab most creators open for moodboards, prototypes and personal projects, and it earns that position. Any comparison that cannot say "for a lot of work, Pexels is simply enough" is not being straight with you.
The limits are the business model's limits. There is no music and no sound effects at all — two of the four media types simply do not exist here. There is no paid tier, which means there is also no licence record, no indemnification, no extended licence, no teams product and nobody whose job is to answer when a platform or client challenges your right to use a clip. The Pexels licence is permissive and broadly trusted, but trust is not paperwork: when a brand's lawyer asks for the licence, "it was on Pexels" is a weaker answer than a verification link.
Its API deserves the praise it gets: free, well documented, and playful in ways paid APIs are not, including search by colour. Brollvia's API exists for a different job — licensing with records, through REST and MCP — and for pure exploration a developer may honestly prefer Pexels'. The platforms are complements more than rivals: draft on free, ship on licensed. These pages exist to make that boundary precise rather than to pretend free is worthless.
At a glance
| Artlist | Pexels | Brollvia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | All-in-one creator subscription | Free stock library | Filmmaker-first stock library |
| Full-access price | Max Pro — $39.99/mo (annual billing) | Free — $0 | $15/mo or $99/yr, unlimited |
| Starting price | Music & SFX Social — from $9.99/mo | Free — $0 | Free to start |
| Library | claims ~0.3M assets | claims ~3M assets | New library — growing |
| Best for | Solo creators and small teams who want music, footage and templates on one bill — especially music-led edits. | Prototypes, personal projects, mood films and any work where a missing licence record is an acceptable risk. | Filmmakers and small teams who want unlimited licensed media with verifiable paperwork, editor panels and an agent that can license for them. |
| Feature coverage | 8 / 16 in full | 4 / 16 in full | 16 / 16 in full |
The scorecard: nine categories, scored from the record
Each row is derived from the shared dataset — the feature matrix, published pricing and each platform's own record. The Edge column names the winner or calls the tie; nobody wins a row on adjectives.
| Category | Artlist | Pexels | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Max Pro — $39.99/mo (annual billing) | Free — $0 | Pexels |
| Library | claims ~0.3M assets | claims ~3M assets | Pexels |
| Footage formats & quality | Fully supported | Fully supported | Tie |
| Music & SFX | Music: fully supported; Sound effects: fully supported | Music: pexels carries no music catalogue; Sound effects: no sound-effects catalogue | Artlist |
| Photos | No headline photo library in Max | Fully supported | Pexels |
| Templates & extras | Carries templates, LUTs | Media-first catalogue — no templates/extras line in its record | Artlist |
| AI features | AI generation in-platform: AI video, image, music, voiceover and avatars on credit tiers; MCP server for AI agents: one secondary source reports a Claude MCP integration for in-chat generation — unverified on an Artlist page, and generation rather than search-and-license; Script-to-B-roll: not offered | AI generation in-platform: no in-platform generation; MCP server for AI agents: not offered; Script-to-B-roll: not offered | Artlist |
| Editor workflow | Editor panels/plugins (Premiere): plugins for Premiere Pro; Editor panels/plugins (Resolve): plugins for DaVinci Resolve | Editor panels/plugins (Premiere): integrations target design tools (Canva, Figma, WordPress), not NLE panels; Editor panels/plugins (Resolve): not offered | Artlist |
| Teams & enterprise | Teams: max Team seats; Extended licences: licence scope follows your plan tier; RAW/LOG is a paid add-on | Teams: not offered; Extended licences: one free licence, no extended tier | Artlist |
The price of full access
Compared on the tier a working filmmaker would actually buy — full media access, not a teaser plan. Brollvia Pro is drawn as the reference line: it is the third option scored at the end of this page.
Library size, as claimed
Both figures are the platforms' own published claims (log scale), not audits — counts mix photos, vectors, templates and footage differently per platform.
Where Artlist wins
- Music depth: stems, playlists and Clearlist claim-clearing have no Brollvia equivalent yet
- Templates and LUTs: roughly 20,000 templates per reviewers — Brollvia offers none
- Professional formats: RAW/LOG and ProRes/DNxHR footage via Artgrid and the Max upgrade
- Catalogue maturity: around 180,000 footage clips per reviewers, against a new, growing library
- AI breadth beyond generation: avatars, voice cloning and consistent-character Studio productions
Where Pexels wins
- Price: free beats $15 every time the project allows it
- Free API generosity: no paid API tier at all
- Library size today: millions of photos and videos
- Zero friction: no account walls worth mentioning, no checkout
Pricing, in each platform's own terms
Artlist
Artlist pricing rewards commitment and bundles. The entry point looks gentle — Music & SFX Social at $9.99/mo — but that buys no footage at all. The honest comparison against Brollvia Pro ($15/mo, unlimited everything) is Max: $29.99/mo for Social, $39.99/mo for Pro, billed annually, so $360–$480 a year against Brollvia's $99 annual launch rate. AI usage is where Artlist bills get unpredictable: Max Pro's price climbs steeply through AI-credit tiers, from around $50 at 16,500 monthly credits to $300+ at half a million, per Artlist's launch materials as summarised by reviewers. If you generate heavily, model your credit burn before the annual bill surprises you.
The RAW/LOG upgrade (+$20/mo) deserves a line of its own, because for colour-critical work it is not optional decoration — it is the difference between footage that grades like your camera originals and footage that does not. Brollvia has no equivalent tier today (its absence is scored honestly in the matrix below), so a fair total-cost comparison for a professional colour workflow is Max Pro + RAW/LOG at roughly $60/mo against Brollvia Pro at $15/mo with that format gap accepted. For everyone else — social, corporate, YouTube, most commercial work — the $15 flat rate is simply cheaper for a comparable bundle.
Pexels
There is nothing to analyse and that is the point: Pexels costs $0, forever, for everything it has. Brollvia's Free plan is the honest counterweight — free searching and limited watermarked comps, with Pro at $15/mo unlocking the licensed originals — and it still does not beat $0 for the media Pexels carries. Where money re-enters the argument is downstream: a Content ID dispute, a client indemnity clause, a brand-safety review. One avoided dispute pays for years of Pro; zero disputes means Pexels was the right price all along. Price the risk, not the download.
Also price the missing media. A project that needs music and SFX cannot be finished on Pexels at any price — you will buy those elsewhere, per-track or by subscription, and the "free" project quietly acquires a budget anyway. Brollvia's case is one invoice for all four media types with the paperwork included. If your work is video-only and non-commercial, ignore this section and enjoy the free library; it is a good one.
The third option
Brollvia
Neither of these two is the library publishing this page. Brollvia is — and rather than pretend otherwise, here is its case and its weakness, scored on the same dataset.
Brollvia is built around a simple observation: the hard part of stock is no longer storing millions of clips — it is finding the right twelve seconds, proving you may use them, and getting them into the timeline. So Brollvia puts its engineering into the search and the paperwork. You can search by describing the scene in plain words, by uploading a single frame and asking for matches, or by pasting a script and letting the platform break it into scenes and propose shots for each one. Every download — by you, by a teammate, or by your AI agent — writes a licence record with a certificate, and anyone can verify that record publicly. No other platform in this comparison publishes a verification page.
The agent layer is the deepest difference. Brollvia runs an MCP server and a REST API with OAuth sign-in, so Claude, ChatGPT and your own tools can search the library and license footage inside the conversation where the brief already lives. When a shot genuinely does not exist, integrated AI generation creates it on a credit system — clearly labelled as AI-generated on the asset, in search filters and on its licence certificate, so nothing synthetic ever passes itself off as photographed footage. Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve panels bring the same search-and-license flow into the editor, licence records included.
And the price is deliberately boring: Pro is $15 a month or $99 a year, unlimited, with packs of curated footage included. There are no credits that make a single video cost six downloads, no per-media plan fragmentation, and no sales call between you and the library. If a rival on this page beats Brollvia for your kind of work, its page here says so plainly — that is the deal these comparisons make with you.
On the shared matrix, Brollvia fully offers what neither Artlist nor Pexels does:
- Contributor marketplace
- MCP server for AI agents
- Script-to-B-roll
- Public licence verification
- Extended licences
- Curated packs
The honest weakness: catalogue scale. Brollvia is a new contributor library — if the brief needs the deepest shelf on earth, one of the two platforms above is the safer pair of hands, and their pages here say so.
Start free See pricing Brollvia vs Artlist Brollvia vs Pexels
Choose Artlist if…
Choose Artlist if music drives your edits: stems, curated playlists and Clearlist's automated YouTube claim-clearing are genuinely class-leading, and if you cut with templates and LUTs you will find roughly 20,000 of them waiting. Its footage arm reaches RAW/LOG and ProRes through Artgrid tiers and the Max upgrade — formats Brollvia does not yet serve.
Choose Pexels if…
Choose Pexels when the honest answer is that the project does not justify a stock budget at all: student films, prototypes, internal decks, social experiments. The curation quality is genuinely high for free media, the licence is simple, and its free API — with unusual features like colour-based search — is a gift to developers. For a large class of real work, $0 is the correct price.
In the edit: workflow
Artlist
In daily use, Artlist feels like a well-stocked record shop: strong playlists, quick previews, plugins that drop media into four different editors, and Clearlist quietly defending your monetisation after publish. The gaps show up when the workflow leaves the browser-and-timeline loop: there is no API for your tools to license footage programmatically, no script-to-shots matching, and no public page where a client or a platform can verify your licence — your proof is your account. Brollvia was designed for exactly that wider loop, at the cost of a younger catalogue.
Pexels
Pexels' workflow is frictionless browsing backed by a lovely API — teams even build internal tools on it. The friction arrives at delivery: no licence artefact to attach to the project, no verification for a client, and a hard stop when the timeline needs a track or a whoosh. Brollvia's loop is built for the delivery end: brief in, verified licensed assets out, in the editor or through your agent. Different moments of the same week, honestly served by different tools.
Switching away
From Artlist
Moving from Artlist to Brollvia is mostly a matter of re-downloading: footage you licensed under Artlist stays licensed under its terms for the uses you made, but your working library, playlists and project organisation do not transfer — no platform in this comparison offers library migration, Artlist included. The practical path is to let the annual plan lapse at renewal, run both for a month on active projects, and rebuild your staples as Brollvia collections and packs. If you rely on stems or Clearlist, weigh those two features honestly before switching; they are Artlist's strongest hold.
From Pexels
There is nothing to cancel and nothing to migrate — Pexels asks nothing of you, which is its charm. The practical switch is a habit: start new commercial work in a licensed library so the paperwork exists from day one, and keep Pexels for the exploratory phase it is perfect for. Past Pexels downloads remain governed by the Pexels licence as published when you took them; keep a note of source URLs in the project file, as you would for any free asset.
Artlist vs Pexels: questions
Which is cheaper, Artlist or Pexels?
On the full-access tier this comparison charts, Artlist runs Max Pro — $39.99/mo (annual billing) and Pexels runs Free — $0. Pexels is the cheaper of the two on that basis — but the models differ: Artlist — Artlist sells media in bundles. Music & SFX starts at $9.99/mo; the all-in-one Max bundle is $29.99/mo (Social) or $39.99/mo (Pro) billed annually, and AI-credit tiers can raise Max Pro steeply. RAW/LOG footage is a +$20/mo upgrade. Pexels — Free. There is no paid tier: no Pro plan, no extended licence, no indemnification, no teams product. Monetisation is contributors' exposure and Canva's ecosystem.
Which has the bigger library, Artlist or Pexels?
Pexels claims the larger catalogue. Artlist: Reviewers count roughly 60,000 music tracks, 50,000 sound effects, 180,000 footage clips and 20,000 templates (CC Hound review, October 2026). Artlist does not publish one audited library total. Pexels: Pexels Play Store listing reports 3M+ free stock photos and videos (October 2026); web trackers quote higher mixed-media totals. Both figures are the platforms' own claims, not audits — depth in your specific niche matters more than the headline total.
Do Artlist or Pexels offer unlimited downloads?
Artlist offers unlimited downloads; Pexels offers unlimited downloads. If unlimited is the deciding factor, check the tier fine print on both — caps and catalogue exclusions are where "unlimited" goes to hide.
Artlist or Pexels — which should a filmmaker pick?
It follows the work. Artlist is solo creators and small teams who want music, footage and templates on one bill — especially music-led edits. Pexels is prototypes, personal projects, mood films and any work where a missing licence record is an acceptable risk. The scorecard above scores the nine categories where they actually differ; the where-they-win lists are written from each platform's own record.
Is there a third option besides Artlist and Pexels?
Brollvia, the platform publishing this comparison — declared interest, stated plainly. Pro is $15/mo or $99/yr, unlimited across video, photos, music and SFX. On this dataset it fully offers what neither of these two does: Contributor marketplace, MCP server for AI agents, Script-to-B-roll, Public licence verification, Extended licences, Curated packs. Its honest weakness is catalogue scale: it is a new contributor library and publishes no comparable total. The full Brollvia-vs-each head-to-heads are linked at the foot of this page, and each lists that rival's wins too.
Data & sources
Data as of October 2026. Library sizes and prices are each company's own published claims or reputable reviewer reports, attributed in the text — not audited figures. Prices change; verify on the provider's site before budgeting. Found an error? Tell us and we will fix the record and this page with it.
Artlist sources
- Artlist — Max launch announcement (official blog)
- CC Hound — Artlist complete review
- SaaSWorthy — Artgrid pricing & tiers
- FrameKit — stock footage licensing roundup
Pexels sources
Or skip the shortlist entirely
Start free, upgrade when the work does. Every download writes a licence record you can verify in public.