Head-to-head · October 2026
Envato Elements vs Pixabay
Envato Elements takes Library, Templates & extras, AI features; Pixabay takes Pricing — and the honest answer still depends on the work: Envato Elements is designers and generalist creators who need fonts, templates and themes as much as footage — the true all-trades subscription, while Pixabay is zero-budget projects that still need music and sound effects alongside photos and video.
Published by Brollvia — a third platform with its own horse in this race, declared up front. Everything below is scored from the same public dataset as our own comparison pages, and the section at the end says where we fit.
Meet the contenders
Envato Elements — Unlimited creative-assets subscription
The breadth play: tens of millions of creative assets — templates, fonts, WordPress themes, graphics, 3D — under one unlimited subscription.
Envato Elements is the subscription form of a simple insight: most creators do not only need footage. They need the title template, the font in the title, the presentation deck for the pitch, the WordPress theme for the campaign site — and Elements sells all of it, unlimited, for $16.50 a month billed annually. Reviews put the catalogue anywhere from 21 million to 60 million assets depending on what gets counted, a range we report rather than resolve; by any count it spans stock video, photos, music and sound effects plus graphic, presentation and video templates, fonts, 3D and web themes. For a generalist freelancer it is close to a utility bill: unglamorous, comprehensive, cheap.
Its licence model is the distinctive part. Every download is assigned — registered — to a client project, and that registration keeps the asset licensed for that project forever, even after the subscription ends. It is tidy for client work and more restrictive than it first looks: use the same clip in a new project and you must register it again, under an active subscription. Brollvia's model is the inverse — a licence record per download, attached to the asset and the production generally, with a public verification page — and the matrix scores the two as different instruments rather than one being broken.
For filmmakers specifically, Elements is a strong second subscription and a weaker first one. The footage is plentiful but the platform's centre of gravity is design: there is no script-to-shots matching, no frame search, no public API or MCP in the sources we checked, and the newer AI-credit tiers (20 a month on Core, up to 2,000 on Ultimate) buy generation as an add-on rather than a library-integrated, labelled feature. It is the best breadth-per-dollar in this comparison and the least filmmaker-specific — both halves of that sentence matter.
Pixabay — Free stock library
The free library with audio: 6.2M+ assets including a real music and SFX catalogue — the most complete free option, with free's usual paperwork gap.
Pixabay is the other half of Canva's free-media empire, and in one respect it out-guns its sibling: breadth. Alongside photos, videos, illustrations and vectors, Pixabay carries music and sound effects — 230k+ music tracks within a claimed 6.2M+ assets — making it the only free library where a complete short film's media can, in principle, come from one free tab. For the world's zero-budget creators that is not a footnote; it is the product.
The caveats are the free model's caveats, plus one specific to audio. Pixabay's own documentation acknowledges that some music may be registered in YouTube's Content ID, meaning a track you are fully licensed to use can still draw an automated claim you must dispute — a rite of passage every volume creator eventually meets. And as with Pexels, free means no licence record per download, no extended licence, no indemnification, no teams product and contributors paid in exposure. The licence is clear and permissive; the evidence trail is yours to improvise.
Against Brollvia the shape of the choice is identical to Pexels, shifted by audio: Pixabay removes the "no music" argument, so the paid case rests entirely on paperwork, workflow and accountability — verifiable licences, panels in both NLEs, script-to-B-roll, agent licensing, generation on the record. For commercial producers those are the costs that actually bite. For everyone else, Pixabay is a genuinely good free library, and these pages say so without flinching.
At a glance
| Envato Elements | Pixabay | Brollvia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unlimited creative-assets subscription | Free stock library | Filmmaker-first stock library |
| Full-access price | Individual — $16.50/mo (annual billing) | Free — $0 | $15/mo or $99/yr, unlimited |
| Starting price | Individual — $16.50/mo (annual billing) | Free — $0 | Free to start |
| Library | claims ~21M assets | claims ~6.2M assets | New library — growing |
| Best for | Designers and generalist creators who need fonts, templates and themes as much as footage — the true all-trades subscription. | Zero-budget projects that still need music and sound effects alongside photos and video. | Filmmakers and small teams who want unlimited licensed media with verifiable paperwork, editor panels and an agent that can license for them. |
| Feature coverage | 6 / 16 in full | 6 / 16 in full | 16 / 16 in full |
The scorecard: nine categories, scored from the record
Each row is derived from the shared dataset — the feature matrix, published pricing and each platform's own record. The Edge column names the winner or calls the tie; nobody wins a row on adjectives.
| Category | Envato Elements | Pixabay | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Individual — $16.50/mo (annual billing) | Free — $0 | Pixabay |
| Library | claims ~21M assets | claims ~6.2M assets | Envato Elements |
| Footage formats & quality | Fully supported | Fully supported | Tie |
| Music & SFX | Music: fully supported; Sound effects: fully supported | Music: fully supported; Sound effects: fully supported | Tie |
| Photos | Fully supported | Fully supported | Tie |
| Templates & extras | Carries templates, fonts, WordPress themes, themes, 3D, graphics | Media-first catalogue — no templates/extras line in its record | Envato Elements |
| AI features | AI generation in-platform: AI tools on tiered monthly credits (20 on Core up to 2,000 on Ultimate); MCP server for AI agents: not offered; Script-to-B-roll: not offered | AI generation in-platform: not offered; MCP server for AI agents: not offered; Script-to-B-roll: not offered | Envato Elements |
| Editor workflow | Editor panels/plugins (Premiere): deep template support for Premiere; no licence-recording panel in sources checked; Editor panels/plugins (Resolve): templates usable in Resolve | Editor panels/plugins (Premiere): not offered; Editor panels/plugins (Resolve): not offered | Envato Elements |
| Teams & enterprise | Teams: per-seat team pricing; Extended licences: a single licence model — assign each download to a project; reuse in a new project needs re-registration | Teams: not offered; Extended licences: not offered | Envato Elements |
The price of full access
Compared on the tier a working filmmaker would actually buy — full media access, not a teaser plan. Brollvia Pro is drawn as the reference line: it is the third option scored at the end of this page.
Library size, as claimed
Both figures are the platforms' own published claims (log scale), not audits — counts mix photos, vectors, templates and footage differently per platform.
Where Envato Elements wins
- Breadth: fonts, themes, presentation and web templates are categories Brollvia does not touch
- Team pricing per seat at annual billing
- Template depth across design and video tools
- Licence persistence for registered projects after cancellation
Where Pixabay wins
- Price: free, across all four media types — unique in this comparison
- Free music depth no other free rival matches
- Catalogue size among free libraries: 6.2M+ claimed
- Zero-friction start for new creators
Pricing, in each platform's own terms
Envato Elements
Elements is the one rival that beats Brollvia Pro on headline price for a comparable promise: $16.50/mo annual ($198/yr) against $15/mo monthly or $99/yr — roughly double Brollvia's annual rate, roughly par monthly, and with far more asset types inside. Teams widen its lead on paper, at ~$10.75 a seat against Brollvia's $12. If your team consumes design assets weekly, Elements may be the cheapest line in your whole stack, and these pages will not argue otherwise.
The pricing caveat is flux: Envato has been restructuring into Core/Plus/Ultimate tiers with AI credits as the ladder, quoted in one source at €14.50/€33/€145 annual equivalents — figures in motion. Verify the current structure on Envato's site before comparing, and note that monthly billing on the classic plan jumps to roughly $33–39, where Brollvia's $15 flat monthly quietly wins again. The honest summary: annual-billed generalists save at Envato; monthly-billed filmmakers save at Brollvia.
Pixabay
Pixabay costs $0 for everything, including the audio that makes it uniquely complete among free libraries — so the pricing analysis is really a risk analysis. The free licence's costs are probabilistic: a Content ID claim to dispute (an hour of admin), a client who wants licence evidence you cannot produce (a credibility cost), a takedown argument with no indemnifier behind you (a real cost, rarely). Brollvia Pro at $99/yr prices all three risks at roughly $8 a month. High-volume or client-facing work clears that bar easily; a hobby channel may never clear it at all, and should not pretend otherwise.
One more pricing reality: "free" libraries monetise attention, not licences, so their incentives run toward catalogue growth and ecosystem pull (both Pexels and Pixabay sit inside Canva's orbit) rather than toward the licensing paperwork professionals need. That is not a criticism — it is why the paperwork does not exist, and why a paid specialist can charge $15 for what is, in the end, mostly evidence and machinery.
The third option
Brollvia
Neither of these two is the library publishing this page. Brollvia is — and rather than pretend otherwise, here is its case and its weakness, scored on the same dataset.
Brollvia is built around a simple observation: the hard part of stock is no longer storing millions of clips — it is finding the right twelve seconds, proving you may use them, and getting them into the timeline. So Brollvia puts its engineering into the search and the paperwork. You can search by describing the scene in plain words, by uploading a single frame and asking for matches, or by pasting a script and letting the platform break it into scenes and propose shots for each one. Every download — by you, by a teammate, or by your AI agent — writes a licence record with a certificate, and anyone can verify that record publicly. No other platform in this comparison publishes a verification page.
The agent layer is the deepest difference. Brollvia runs an MCP server and a REST API with OAuth sign-in, so Claude, ChatGPT and your own tools can search the library and license footage inside the conversation where the brief already lives. When a shot genuinely does not exist, integrated AI generation creates it on a credit system — clearly labelled as AI-generated on the asset, in search filters and on its licence certificate, so nothing synthetic ever passes itself off as photographed footage. Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve panels bring the same search-and-license flow into the editor, licence records included.
And the price is deliberately boring: Pro is $15 a month or $99 a year, unlimited, with packs of curated footage included. There are no credits that make a single video cost six downloads, no per-media plan fragmentation, and no sales call between you and the library. If a rival on this page beats Brollvia for your kind of work, its page here says so plainly — that is the deal these comparisons make with you.
On the shared matrix, Brollvia fully offers what neither Envato Elements nor Pixabay does:
- Contributor marketplace
- MCP server for AI agents
- Script-to-B-roll
- AI generation in-platform
- Editor panels/plugins (Premiere)
- Editor panels/plugins (Resolve)
- Public licence verification
- Extended licences
- Curated packs
The honest weakness: catalogue scale. Brollvia is a new contributor library — if the brief needs the deepest shelf on earth, one of the two platforms above is the safer pair of hands, and their pages here say so.
Start free See pricing Brollvia vs Envato Elements Brollvia vs Pixabay
Choose Envato Elements if…
Choose Envato Elements if your deliverables regularly include the design layer — presentations, social templates, fonts, WordPress themes, graphics — alongside footage and music. Unlimited everything at $16.50/mo, cheap team seats, and a licence that keeps registered projects covered after you cancel make it the pragmatic generalist subscription, full stop.
Choose Pixabay if…
Choose Pixabay when the budget is genuinely zero and the brief still spans media types: it is the only free library in this comparison with a real music catalogue (230k+ tracks by its own count) and sound effects beside photos, video and vectors. For community projects, prototypes and content that will never face a rights audit, that completeness at $0 is a legitimate, complete answer.
In the edit: workflow
Envato Elements
Elements fits a generalist's week: one search box for the deck, the font, the lower-third template and the track under it. Downloads are unlimited and painless; the per-project registration is a small, worthy admin habit. Filmmakers feel the seams in the edit — template support for Premiere is deep, but there is no licence-recording panel in either NLE, no agent to brief, and no verification link when a client's producer asks for paperwork. Brollvia is unambiguously the editing-native tool; Elements is the studio-supply cupboard.
Pixabay
Pixabay's workflow is generous and simple: search everything, download, keep a note of the source page if you are disciplined. Its API is free and capable within rate limits — fine for tools and prototypes, but it licenses nothing and records nothing. Brollvia's loop assumes the delivery end matters: assets arrive in Premiere or Resolve with licence records attached, searchable by frame or by script, and provable to a third party. Creators feel the difference exactly once — the first time a client or platform asks — and it tends to be decisive.
Switching away
From Envato Elements
Envato's licence makes leaving unusually graceful: projects you registered stay licensed after cancellation, so finished client work is never hostage. What does not travel is the ability to register new uses — every future project needs its downloads licensed somewhere, which is the moment switchers feel the model difference. Download your licence registrations before cancelling, keep them with the project archives, and expect to re-acquire staple templates and fonts under your new platform's terms.
From Pixabay
As with any free library, there is nothing to cancel; the switch is a workflow habit for new commercial work. Keep source URLs for past Pixabay downloads in the project files (your only evidence trail), and be especially careful to note which audio tracks you used, in case a Content ID claim needs a dispute months later. Contributors weighing where to upload should compare exposure honestly against royalties: free libraries give reach; paid platforms give income; many portfolios use both deliberately.
Envato Elements vs Pixabay: questions
Which is cheaper, Envato Elements or Pixabay?
On the full-access tier this comparison charts, Envato Elements runs Individual — $16.50/mo (annual billing) and Pixabay runs Free — $0. Pixabay is the cheaper of the two on that basis — but the models differ: Envato Elements — Individual $16.50/mo billed annually (roughly $33–39 monthly); Teams from ~$10.75/seat/mo annual. A newer Core/Plus/Ultimate structure adds tiered AI credits (20 a month on Core up to 500–2,000 on Ultimate); the restructure was still settling in sources, so verify on Envato's site. Pixabay — Free. Like Pexels there is no paid tier, no extended licence, no indemnification and no teams product — Canva owns both free libraries.
Which has the bigger library, Envato Elements or Pixabay?
Envato Elements claims the larger catalogue. Envato Elements: Envato claims tens of millions of assets; sources conflict sharply — 21M+ in one review, 54M–60M+ in others (October 2026) — so we chart the conservative 21M+ figure and flag the range. Pixabay: Pixabay reports 6.2M+ royalty-free assets including 230k+ music tracks (site/GitHub figures, October 2026) — the largest free catalogue in this comparison. Both figures are the platforms' own claims, not audits — depth in your specific niche matters more than the headline total.
Do Envato Elements or Pixabay offer unlimited downloads?
Envato Elements offers unlimited downloads; Pixabay offers unlimited downloads. If unlimited is the deciding factor, check the tier fine print on both — caps and catalogue exclusions are where "unlimited" goes to hide.
Envato Elements or Pixabay — which should a filmmaker pick?
It follows the work. Envato Elements is designers and generalist creators who need fonts, templates and themes as much as footage — the true all-trades subscription. Pixabay is zero-budget projects that still need music and sound effects alongside photos and video. The scorecard above scores the nine categories where they actually differ; the where-they-win lists are written from each platform's own record.
Is there a third option besides Envato Elements and Pixabay?
Brollvia, the platform publishing this comparison — declared interest, stated plainly. Pro is $15/mo or $99/yr, unlimited across video, photos, music and SFX. On this dataset it fully offers what neither of these two does: Contributor marketplace, MCP server for AI agents, Script-to-B-roll, AI generation in-platform, Editor panels/plugins (Premiere), Editor panels/plugins (Resolve), Public licence verification, Extended licences, Curated packs. Its honest weakness is catalogue scale: it is a new contributor library and publishes no comparable total. The full Brollvia-vs-each head-to-heads are linked at the foot of this page, and each lists that rival's wins too.
Data & sources
Data as of October 2026. Library sizes and prices are each company's own published claims or reputable reviewer reports, attributed in the text — not audited figures. Prices change; verify on the provider's site before budgeting. Found an error? Tell us and we will fix the record and this page with it.
Envato Elements sources
- Sharetool — Envato Elements review (21M+ claim, licence model)
- Vendr — Envato pricing
- WDesignKit — Envato tiers & AI credits
Pixabay sources
Or skip the shortlist entirely
Start free, upgrade when the work does. Every download writes a licence record you can verify in public.