Head-to-head · October 2026
Artlist vs Shutterstock
Artlist takes Pricing, Templates & extras, AI features; Shutterstock takes Library, Photos, Teams & enterprise — and the honest answer still depends on the work: Artlist is solo creators and small teams who want music, footage and templates on one bill — especially music-led edits, while Shutterstock is agencies and enterprises that need everything — including editorial and 3D — from one vendor, with indemnification to match the risk.
Published by Brollvia — a third platform with its own horse in this race, declared up front. Everything below is scored from the same public dataset as our own comparison pages, and the section at the end says where we fit.
Meet the contenders
Artlist — All-in-one creator subscription
A music-first creator bundle: music, SFX, footage, templates and a large AI suite under one Max subscription.
Artlist began as a music licensing service for filmmakers and has grown, tier by tier, into the closest thing the market has to Brollvia's shape: one subscription that bundles royalty-free music, sound effects, stock footage, video templates and LUTs, wrapped in a fast-growing AI toolkit. Its flagship Max plan adds AI video, image and music generation, AI voiceover and avatars, and a Studio product for keeping characters and locations consistent across AI-generated scenes. Reviewers count roughly 60,000 music tracks, 50,000 sound effects, 180,000 footage clips and 20,000 templates — a mid-sized but carefully curated catalogue, positioned on quality and ease rather than raw scale.
Two Artlist features deserve respect from any filmmaker. The first is music depth: Max includes stems, so an editor can rebalance a track or lift the vocal out of a cue, and the catalogue is organised into playlists by mood, genre and use case. The second is Clearlist, which connects to your YouTube channel, monitors uploads and automatically clears the false copyright claims that plague stock-music users — unglamorous, monetisation-saving work that most libraries, Brollvia included, do not yet do for you. Artlist also ships plugins for Premiere Pro, After Effects, Final Cut and DaVinci Resolve, so its media can be pulled into the timeline without a browser round-trip.
Where Artlist's model differs from Brollvia's is openness. There is no documented public API for searching and licensing its catalogue, and the one report of an MCP integration — a secondary source describing Claude-based in-chat generation — is about generating media, not licensing the library, and was not verified on an Artlist page in our research. Licensing proof is account-bound: your coverage lives in your Artlist account rather than behind a public verification anyone can check. And while Max is a strong bundle, its price — $39.99 a month for Pro, before the RAW/LOG upgrade — sits well above Brollvia Pro.
Shutterstock — Full-service stock marketplace
The everything marketplace: a claimed 600M+ assets, editorial, 3D models, a built-in design editor and enterprise licensing with serious indemnification.
Shutterstock is the incumbent's incumbent: two decades of marketplace gravity, a claimed 600M+ assets — photos, vectors, illustrations, footage, music, sound effects and 3D models — and an editorial arm with 50M+ news, sport and entertainment images that pure creative libraries cannot replicate. It has spent that gravity widely: a design editor (Create, formerly Creative Flow) with AI background removal and smart resizing, native mobile and desktop apps, a custom-production arm, and an enterprise tier, Premier, that sells unlimited indemnification, SSO, dedicated account management and human curation. Judged as a standalone marketplace, our research found it the most feature-rich of all.
Its AI has arrived as a bundle rather than a product: Unlimited Plus, the $69/mo annual plan, folds unlimited media together with 100 AI generation credits a month spanning Runway, Google and OpenAI models, and a standalone GenAI tier sells generation on its own. That is convenient, though reviewers note the unlimited plan still carries a 100-downloads-a-day ceiling, and generation is a credits sidecar rather than a labelled, integrated part of the library the way Brollvia treats it.
The cost of everything is fragmentation. Images, video, music and AI each have their own plan ladders, prices differ between monthly and annual in jumps ($69 vs $199 for the same Unlimited Plus), and team pricing starts around $489/mo in trackers. There is an API — Shutterstock's is well established — but no MCP agent licensing, no script matching, and no public licence verification. Shutterstock is a department store with an excellent legal department; Brollvia is a specialist shop with better machinery at the counter.
At a glance
| Artlist | Shutterstock | Brollvia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | All-in-one creator subscription | Full-service stock marketplace | Filmmaker-first stock library |
| Full-access price | Max Pro — $39.99/mo (annual billing) | Unlimited Plus — $69/mo (annual billing) | $15/mo or $99/yr, unlimited |
| Starting price | Music & SFX Social — from $9.99/mo | Image plan — ~$29/mo for 10 downloads | Free to start |
| Library | claims ~0.3M assets | claims ~600M assets | New library — growing |
| Best for | Solo creators and small teams who want music, footage and templates on one bill — especially music-led edits. | Agencies and enterprises that need everything — including editorial and 3D — from one vendor, with indemnification to match the risk. | Filmmakers and small teams who want unlimited licensed media with verifiable paperwork, editor panels and an agent that can license for them. |
| Feature coverage | 8 / 16 in full | 9 / 16 in full | 16 / 16 in full |
The scorecard: nine categories, scored from the record
Each row is derived from the shared dataset — the feature matrix, published pricing and each platform's own record. The Edge column names the winner or calls the tie; nobody wins a row on adjectives.
| Category | Artlist | Shutterstock | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Max Pro — $39.99/mo (annual billing) | Unlimited Plus — $69/mo (annual billing) | Artlist |
| Library | claims ~0.3M assets | claims ~600M assets | Shutterstock |
| Footage formats & quality | Fully supported | Fully supported | Tie |
| Music & SFX | Music: fully supported; Sound effects: fully supported | Music: fully supported; Sound effects: fully supported | Tie |
| Photos | No headline photo library in Max | Fully supported | Shutterstock |
| Templates & extras | Carries templates, LUTs | Carries 3D | Artlist |
| AI features | AI generation in-platform: AI video, image, music, voiceover and avatars on credit tiers; MCP server for AI agents: one secondary source reports a Claude MCP integration for in-chat generation — unverified on an Artlist page, and generation rather than search-and-license; Script-to-B-roll: not offered | AI generation in-platform: genAI tier plus 100 monthly AI credits on Unlimited Plus (Runway, Google, OpenAI models); MCP server for AI agents: not offered; Script-to-B-roll: not offered | Artlist |
| Editor workflow | Editor panels/plugins (Premiere): plugins for Premiere Pro; Editor panels/plugins (Resolve): plugins for DaVinci Resolve | Editor panels/plugins (Premiere): integrations focus on design tools and its own apps; no licence-recording NLE panel in sources checked; Editor panels/plugins (Resolve): not offered | Artlist |
| Teams & enterprise | Teams: max Team seats; Extended licences: licence scope follows your plan tier; RAW/LOG is a paid add-on | Teams: team and Premier tiers; Extended licences: enhanced licences raise indemnification to $250,000; Premier is unlimited | Shutterstock |
The price of full access
Compared on the tier a working filmmaker would actually buy — full media access, not a teaser plan. Brollvia Pro is drawn as the reference line: it is the third option scored at the end of this page.
Library size, as claimed
Both figures are the platforms' own published claims (log scale), not audits — counts mix photos, vectors, templates and footage differently per platform.
Where Artlist wins
- Music depth: stems, playlists and Clearlist claim-clearing have no Brollvia equivalent yet
- Templates and LUTs: roughly 20,000 templates per reviewers — Brollvia offers none
- Professional formats: RAW/LOG and ProRes/DNxHR footage via Artgrid and the Max upgrade
- Catalogue maturity: around 180,000 footage clips per reviewers, against a new, growing library
- AI breadth beyond generation: avatars, voice cloning and consistent-character Studio productions
Where Shutterstock wins
- Scale and editorial: news, sport and archive content Brollvia does not carry
- 3D models and vector/illustration depth beyond the four media types
- A built-in design editor — Brollvia deliberately has none
- Native mobile and desktop apps; Brollvia is a PWA
- Enterprise depth: unlimited indemnification and SSO on Premier
Pricing, in each platform's own terms
Artlist
Artlist pricing rewards commitment and bundles. The entry point looks gentle — Music & SFX Social at $9.99/mo — but that buys no footage at all. The honest comparison against Brollvia Pro ($15/mo, unlimited everything) is Max: $29.99/mo for Social, $39.99/mo for Pro, billed annually, so $360–$480 a year against Brollvia's $99 annual launch rate. AI usage is where Artlist bills get unpredictable: Max Pro's price climbs steeply through AI-credit tiers, from around $50 at 16,500 monthly credits to $300+ at half a million, per Artlist's launch materials as summarised by reviewers. If you generate heavily, model your credit burn before the annual bill surprises you.
The RAW/LOG upgrade (+$20/mo) deserves a line of its own, because for colour-critical work it is not optional decoration — it is the difference between footage that grades like your camera originals and footage that does not. Brollvia has no equivalent tier today (its absence is scored honestly in the matrix below), so a fair total-cost comparison for a professional colour workflow is Max Pro + RAW/LOG at roughly $60/mo against Brollvia Pro at $15/mo with that format gap accepted. For everyone else — social, corporate, YouTube, most commercial work — the $15 flat rate is simply cheaper for a comparable bundle.
Shutterstock
Price Shutterstock by assembling your actual basket. Ten image downloads run ~$25–29/mo annual; add serious video and music and you are quickly guided to Unlimited Plus at $69/mo annual — $828 a year — or $199/mo if you refuse the annual term, a spread that tells you how the pricing is engineered. Team sits near $489/mo, and Premier is a negotiation. Against that, Brollvia Pro is $99/yr with everything in, and Teams is $12 a seat. For a solo filmmaker the difference is roughly eightfold; for an agency, Shutterstock's consolidation and indemnification may still be the cheaper risk decision.
Indemnification is the line item to read carefully. Standard Shutterstock coverage is $10,000; Enhanced raises it to $250,000; Premier is unlimited. Brollvia's extended licence covers broader uses per asset, but it does not publish a Shutterstock-scale indemnification ladder, and pretending otherwise would be exactly the kind of claim these pages refuse to make. If your clients contractually demand six-figure coverage, that requirement alone can decide this comparison — for most independent and commercial work, it never comes up.
The third option
Brollvia
Neither of these two is the library publishing this page. Brollvia is — and rather than pretend otherwise, here is its case and its weakness, scored on the same dataset.
Brollvia is built around a simple observation: the hard part of stock is no longer storing millions of clips — it is finding the right twelve seconds, proving you may use them, and getting them into the timeline. So Brollvia puts its engineering into the search and the paperwork. You can search by describing the scene in plain words, by uploading a single frame and asking for matches, or by pasting a script and letting the platform break it into scenes and propose shots for each one. Every download — by you, by a teammate, or by your AI agent — writes a licence record with a certificate, and anyone can verify that record publicly. No other platform in this comparison publishes a verification page.
The agent layer is the deepest difference. Brollvia runs an MCP server and a REST API with OAuth sign-in, so Claude, ChatGPT and your own tools can search the library and license footage inside the conversation where the brief already lives. When a shot genuinely does not exist, integrated AI generation creates it on a credit system — clearly labelled as AI-generated on the asset, in search filters and on its licence certificate, so nothing synthetic ever passes itself off as photographed footage. Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve panels bring the same search-and-license flow into the editor, licence records included.
And the price is deliberately boring: Pro is $15 a month or $99 a year, unlimited, with packs of curated footage included. There are no credits that make a single video cost six downloads, no per-media plan fragmentation, and no sales call between you and the library. If a rival on this page beats Brollvia for your kind of work, its page here says so plainly — that is the deal these comparisons make with you.
On the shared matrix, Brollvia fully offers what neither Artlist nor Shutterstock does:
- MCP server for AI agents
- Script-to-B-roll
- Public licence verification
- Curated packs
The honest weakness: catalogue scale. Brollvia is a new contributor library — if the brief needs the deepest shelf on earth, one of the two platforms above is the safer pair of hands, and their pages here say so.
Start free See pricing Brollvia vs Artlist Brollvia vs Shutterstock
Choose Artlist if…
Choose Artlist if music drives your edits: stems, curated playlists and Clearlist's automated YouTube claim-clearing are genuinely class-leading, and if you cut with templates and LUTs you will find roughly 20,000 of them waiting. Its footage arm reaches RAW/LOG and ProRes through Artgrid tiers and the Max upgrade — formats Brollvia does not yet serve.
Choose Shutterstock if…
Choose Shutterstock if your brief regularly leaves the creative library: news, sport and celebrity editorial; 3D models; a client who demands $250,000 of indemnification in writing, or unlimited on Premier. Its Create editor and native apps round out a platform that tries to be the only vendor on the invoice, and for large organisations that consolidation is worth real money.
In the edit: workflow
Artlist
In daily use, Artlist feels like a well-stocked record shop: strong playlists, quick previews, plugins that drop media into four different editors, and Clearlist quietly defending your monetisation after publish. The gaps show up when the workflow leaves the browser-and-timeline loop: there is no API for your tools to license footage programmatically, no script-to-shots matching, and no public page where a client or a platform can verify your licence — your proof is your account. Brollvia was designed for exactly that wider loop, at the cost of a younger catalogue.
Shutterstock
Shutterstock's workflow is breadth-first: whatever the brief, something in 600M assets approximates it, the Create editor polishes stills without another app, and the mobile apps keep approvals moving. Video editors work through the browser or its integrations rather than a licence-recording NLE panel, and agents get an API aimed at integrations, not a conversation-native licensing flow. Licence proof is enterprise-grade inside your account — Premier even adds humans to curate — but it is not a public link a client can check at midnight.
Switching away
From Artlist
Moving from Artlist to Brollvia is mostly a matter of re-downloading: footage you licensed under Artlist stays licensed under its terms for the uses you made, but your working library, playlists and project organisation do not transfer — no platform in this comparison offers library migration, Artlist included. The practical path is to let the annual plan lapse at renewal, run both for a month on active projects, and rebuild your staples as Brollvia collections and packs. If you rely on stems or Clearlist, weigh those two features honestly before switching; they are Artlist's strongest hold.
From Shutterstock
Shutterstock licences for published work persist after cancellation, and Enhanced/Premier paperwork should be archived with the project files it covers — that indemnification trail is part of what you paid for. Practically, most switchers keep a minimal Shutterstock plan for editorial and oddities while moving day-to-day creative work to a flat-rate library; a full exit makes sense only when editorial truly never appears in your briefs. Either way, download and file your licence history before the term ends.
Artlist vs Shutterstock: questions
Which is cheaper, Artlist or Shutterstock?
On the full-access tier this comparison charts, Artlist runs Max Pro — $39.99/mo (annual billing) and Shutterstock runs Unlimited Plus — $69/mo (annual billing). Artlist is the cheaper of the two on that basis — but the models differ: Artlist — Artlist sells media in bundles. Music & SFX starts at $9.99/mo; the all-in-one Max bundle is $29.99/mo (Social) or $39.99/mo (Pro) billed annually, and AI-credit tiers can raise Max Pro steeply. RAW/LOG footage is a +$20/mo upgrade. Shutterstock — Fragmented by media type: image plans from ~$25–29/mo for 10 downloads (annual); Unlimited Plus at $69/mo annual ($199 monthly) bundles unlimited media with 100 AI credits; standalone GenAI $15/mo; Team around $489/mo; Premier enterprise is custom.
Which has the bigger library, Artlist or Shutterstock?
Shutterstock claims the larger catalogue. Artlist: Reviewers count roughly 60,000 music tracks, 50,000 sound effects, 180,000 footage clips and 20,000 templates (CC Hound review, October 2026). Artlist does not publish one audited library total. Shutterstock: Reviews put Shutterstock at 600M+ assets including 50M+ editorial images (CreativeVault review, October 2026); other trackers report 450M–700M, so treat the total as a marketing range, not an audited count. Both figures are the platforms' own claims, not audits — depth in your specific niche matters more than the headline total.
Do Artlist or Shutterstock offer unlimited downloads?
Artlist offers unlimited downloads; Shutterstock is unlimited only in part (Unlimited Plus tier only, and reviews note a 100 downloads/day cap). If unlimited is the deciding factor, check the tier fine print on both — caps and catalogue exclusions are where "unlimited" goes to hide.
Artlist or Shutterstock — which should a filmmaker pick?
It follows the work. Artlist is solo creators and small teams who want music, footage and templates on one bill — especially music-led edits. Shutterstock is agencies and enterprises that need everything — including editorial and 3D — from one vendor, with indemnification to match the risk. The scorecard above scores the nine categories where they actually differ; the where-they-win lists are written from each platform's own record.
Is there a third option besides Artlist and Shutterstock?
Brollvia, the platform publishing this comparison — declared interest, stated plainly. Pro is $15/mo or $99/yr, unlimited across video, photos, music and SFX. On this dataset it fully offers what neither of these two does: MCP server for AI agents, Script-to-B-roll, Public licence verification, Curated packs. Its honest weakness is catalogue scale: it is a new contributor library and publishes no comparable total. The full Brollvia-vs-each head-to-heads are linked at the foot of this page, and each lists that rival's wins too.
Data & sources
Data as of October 2026. Library sizes and prices are each company's own published claims or reputable reviewer reports, attributed in the text — not audited figures. Prices change; verify on the provider's site before budgeting. Found an error? Tell us and we will fix the record and this page with it.
Artlist sources
- Artlist — Max launch announcement (official blog)
- CC Hound — Artlist complete review
- SaaSWorthy — Artgrid pricing & tiers
- FrameKit — stock footage licensing roundup
Shutterstock sources
Or skip the shortlist entirely
Start free, upgrade when the work does. Every download writes a licence record you can verify in public.