Head-to-head · October 2026
Shutterstock vs Pexels
Shutterstock takes Library, Music & SFX, Templates & extras; Pexels takes Pricing — and the honest answer still depends on the work: Shutterstock is agencies and enterprises that need everything — including editorial and 3D — from one vendor, with indemnification to match the risk, while Pexels is prototypes, personal projects, mood films and any work where a missing licence record is an acceptable risk.
Published by Brollvia — a third platform with its own horse in this race, declared up front. Everything below is scored from the same public dataset as our own comparison pages, and the section at the end says where we fit.
Meet the contenders
Shutterstock — Full-service stock marketplace
The everything marketplace: a claimed 600M+ assets, editorial, 3D models, a built-in design editor and enterprise licensing with serious indemnification.
Shutterstock is the incumbent's incumbent: two decades of marketplace gravity, a claimed 600M+ assets — photos, vectors, illustrations, footage, music, sound effects and 3D models — and an editorial arm with 50M+ news, sport and entertainment images that pure creative libraries cannot replicate. It has spent that gravity widely: a design editor (Create, formerly Creative Flow) with AI background removal and smart resizing, native mobile and desktop apps, a custom-production arm, and an enterprise tier, Premier, that sells unlimited indemnification, SSO, dedicated account management and human curation. Judged as a standalone marketplace, our research found it the most feature-rich of all.
Its AI has arrived as a bundle rather than a product: Unlimited Plus, the $69/mo annual plan, folds unlimited media together with 100 AI generation credits a month spanning Runway, Google and OpenAI models, and a standalone GenAI tier sells generation on its own. That is convenient, though reviewers note the unlimited plan still carries a 100-downloads-a-day ceiling, and generation is a credits sidecar rather than a labelled, integrated part of the library the way Brollvia treats it.
The cost of everything is fragmentation. Images, video, music and AI each have their own plan ladders, prices differ between monthly and annual in jumps ($69 vs $199 for the same Unlimited Plus), and team pricing starts around $489/mo in trackers. There is an API — Shutterstock's is well established — but no MCP agent licensing, no script matching, and no public licence verification. Shutterstock is a department store with an excellent legal department; Brollvia is a specialist shop with better machinery at the counter.
Pexels — Free stock library
The free library done well: genuinely good photos and videos, a beloved free API, and no price at all — with the limits that come with free.
Pexels is what happens when a free library is run with taste. Owned by Canva, it offers millions of photos and videos — its Play Store listing says 3M+ — shot by a large contributor community and curated well above the free-library average, under a simple licence that does not even require attribution. It is the first tab most creators open for moodboards, prototypes and personal projects, and it earns that position. Any comparison that cannot say "for a lot of work, Pexels is simply enough" is not being straight with you.
The limits are the business model's limits. There is no music and no sound effects at all — two of the four media types simply do not exist here. There is no paid tier, which means there is also no licence record, no indemnification, no extended licence, no teams product and nobody whose job is to answer when a platform or client challenges your right to use a clip. The Pexels licence is permissive and broadly trusted, but trust is not paperwork: when a brand's lawyer asks for the licence, "it was on Pexels" is a weaker answer than a verification link.
Its API deserves the praise it gets: free, well documented, and playful in ways paid APIs are not, including search by colour. Brollvia's API exists for a different job — licensing with records, through REST and MCP — and for pure exploration a developer may honestly prefer Pexels'. The platforms are complements more than rivals: draft on free, ship on licensed. These pages exist to make that boundary precise rather than to pretend free is worthless.
At a glance
| Shutterstock | Pexels | Brollvia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full-service stock marketplace | Free stock library | Filmmaker-first stock library |
| Full-access price | Unlimited Plus — $69/mo (annual billing) | Free — $0 | $15/mo or $99/yr, unlimited |
| Starting price | Image plan — ~$29/mo for 10 downloads | Free — $0 | Free to start |
| Library | claims ~600M assets | claims ~3M assets | New library — growing |
| Best for | Agencies and enterprises that need everything — including editorial and 3D — from one vendor, with indemnification to match the risk. | Prototypes, personal projects, mood films and any work where a missing licence record is an acceptable risk. | Filmmakers and small teams who want unlimited licensed media with verifiable paperwork, editor panels and an agent that can license for them. |
| Feature coverage | 9 / 16 in full | 4 / 16 in full | 16 / 16 in full |
The scorecard: nine categories, scored from the record
Each row is derived from the shared dataset — the feature matrix, published pricing and each platform's own record. The Edge column names the winner or calls the tie; nobody wins a row on adjectives.
| Category | Shutterstock | Pexels | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Unlimited Plus — $69/mo (annual billing) | Free — $0 | Pexels |
| Library | claims ~600M assets | claims ~3M assets | Shutterstock |
| Footage formats & quality | Fully supported | Fully supported | Tie |
| Music & SFX | Music: fully supported; Sound effects: fully supported | Music: pexels carries no music catalogue; Sound effects: no sound-effects catalogue | Shutterstock |
| Photos | Fully supported | Fully supported | Tie |
| Templates & extras | Carries 3D | Media-first catalogue — no templates/extras line in its record | Shutterstock |
| AI features | AI generation in-platform: genAI tier plus 100 monthly AI credits on Unlimited Plus (Runway, Google, OpenAI models); MCP server for AI agents: not offered; Script-to-B-roll: not offered | AI generation in-platform: no in-platform generation; MCP server for AI agents: not offered; Script-to-B-roll: not offered | Shutterstock |
| Editor workflow | Editor panels/plugins (Premiere): integrations focus on design tools and its own apps; no licence-recording NLE panel in sources checked; Editor panels/plugins (Resolve): not offered | Editor panels/plugins (Premiere): integrations target design tools (Canva, Figma, WordPress), not NLE panels; Editor panels/plugins (Resolve): not offered | Shutterstock |
| Teams & enterprise | Teams: team and Premier tiers; Extended licences: enhanced licences raise indemnification to $250,000; Premier is unlimited | Teams: not offered; Extended licences: one free licence, no extended tier | Shutterstock |
The price of full access
Compared on the tier a working filmmaker would actually buy — full media access, not a teaser plan. Brollvia Pro is drawn as the reference line: it is the third option scored at the end of this page.
Library size, as claimed
Both figures are the platforms' own published claims (log scale), not audits — counts mix photos, vectors, templates and footage differently per platform.
Where Shutterstock wins
- Scale and editorial: news, sport and archive content Brollvia does not carry
- 3D models and vector/illustration depth beyond the four media types
- A built-in design editor — Brollvia deliberately has none
- Native mobile and desktop apps; Brollvia is a PWA
- Enterprise depth: unlimited indemnification and SSO on Premier
Where Pexels wins
- Price: free beats $15 every time the project allows it
- Free API generosity: no paid API tier at all
- Library size today: millions of photos and videos
- Zero friction: no account walls worth mentioning, no checkout
Pricing, in each platform's own terms
Shutterstock
Price Shutterstock by assembling your actual basket. Ten image downloads run ~$25–29/mo annual; add serious video and music and you are quickly guided to Unlimited Plus at $69/mo annual — $828 a year — or $199/mo if you refuse the annual term, a spread that tells you how the pricing is engineered. Team sits near $489/mo, and Premier is a negotiation. Against that, Brollvia Pro is $99/yr with everything in, and Teams is $12 a seat. For a solo filmmaker the difference is roughly eightfold; for an agency, Shutterstock's consolidation and indemnification may still be the cheaper risk decision.
Indemnification is the line item to read carefully. Standard Shutterstock coverage is $10,000; Enhanced raises it to $250,000; Premier is unlimited. Brollvia's extended licence covers broader uses per asset, but it does not publish a Shutterstock-scale indemnification ladder, and pretending otherwise would be exactly the kind of claim these pages refuse to make. If your clients contractually demand six-figure coverage, that requirement alone can decide this comparison — for most independent and commercial work, it never comes up.
Pexels
There is nothing to analyse and that is the point: Pexels costs $0, forever, for everything it has. Brollvia's Free plan is the honest counterweight — free searching and limited watermarked comps, with Pro at $15/mo unlocking the licensed originals — and it still does not beat $0 for the media Pexels carries. Where money re-enters the argument is downstream: a Content ID dispute, a client indemnity clause, a brand-safety review. One avoided dispute pays for years of Pro; zero disputes means Pexels was the right price all along. Price the risk, not the download.
Also price the missing media. A project that needs music and SFX cannot be finished on Pexels at any price — you will buy those elsewhere, per-track or by subscription, and the "free" project quietly acquires a budget anyway. Brollvia's case is one invoice for all four media types with the paperwork included. If your work is video-only and non-commercial, ignore this section and enjoy the free library; it is a good one.
The third option
Brollvia
Neither of these two is the library publishing this page. Brollvia is — and rather than pretend otherwise, here is its case and its weakness, scored on the same dataset.
Brollvia is built around a simple observation: the hard part of stock is no longer storing millions of clips — it is finding the right twelve seconds, proving you may use them, and getting them into the timeline. So Brollvia puts its engineering into the search and the paperwork. You can search by describing the scene in plain words, by uploading a single frame and asking for matches, or by pasting a script and letting the platform break it into scenes and propose shots for each one. Every download — by you, by a teammate, or by your AI agent — writes a licence record with a certificate, and anyone can verify that record publicly. No other platform in this comparison publishes a verification page.
The agent layer is the deepest difference. Brollvia runs an MCP server and a REST API with OAuth sign-in, so Claude, ChatGPT and your own tools can search the library and license footage inside the conversation where the brief already lives. When a shot genuinely does not exist, integrated AI generation creates it on a credit system — clearly labelled as AI-generated on the asset, in search filters and on its licence certificate, so nothing synthetic ever passes itself off as photographed footage. Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve panels bring the same search-and-license flow into the editor, licence records included.
And the price is deliberately boring: Pro is $15 a month or $99 a year, unlimited, with packs of curated footage included. There are no credits that make a single video cost six downloads, no per-media plan fragmentation, and no sales call between you and the library. If a rival on this page beats Brollvia for your kind of work, its page here says so plainly — that is the deal these comparisons make with you.
On the shared matrix, Brollvia fully offers what neither Shutterstock nor Pexels does:
- MCP server for AI agents
- Script-to-B-roll
- Editor panels/plugins (Premiere)
- Editor panels/plugins (Resolve)
- Public licence verification
- Curated packs
The honest weakness: catalogue scale. Brollvia is a new contributor library — if the brief needs the deepest shelf on earth, one of the two platforms above is the safer pair of hands, and their pages here say so.
Start free See pricing Brollvia vs Shutterstock Brollvia vs Pexels
Choose Shutterstock if…
Choose Shutterstock if your brief regularly leaves the creative library: news, sport and celebrity editorial; 3D models; a client who demands $250,000 of indemnification in writing, or unlimited on Premier. Its Create editor and native apps round out a platform that tries to be the only vendor on the invoice, and for large organisations that consolidation is worth real money.
Choose Pexels if…
Choose Pexels when the honest answer is that the project does not justify a stock budget at all: student films, prototypes, internal decks, social experiments. The curation quality is genuinely high for free media, the licence is simple, and its free API — with unusual features like colour-based search — is a gift to developers. For a large class of real work, $0 is the correct price.
In the edit: workflow
Shutterstock
Shutterstock's workflow is breadth-first: whatever the brief, something in 600M assets approximates it, the Create editor polishes stills without another app, and the mobile apps keep approvals moving. Video editors work through the browser or its integrations rather than a licence-recording NLE panel, and agents get an API aimed at integrations, not a conversation-native licensing flow. Licence proof is enterprise-grade inside your account — Premier even adds humans to curate — but it is not a public link a client can check at midnight.
Pexels
Pexels' workflow is frictionless browsing backed by a lovely API — teams even build internal tools on it. The friction arrives at delivery: no licence artefact to attach to the project, no verification for a client, and a hard stop when the timeline needs a track or a whoosh. Brollvia's loop is built for the delivery end: brief in, verified licensed assets out, in the editor or through your agent. Different moments of the same week, honestly served by different tools.
Switching away
From Shutterstock
Shutterstock licences for published work persist after cancellation, and Enhanced/Premier paperwork should be archived with the project files it covers — that indemnification trail is part of what you paid for. Practically, most switchers keep a minimal Shutterstock plan for editorial and oddities while moving day-to-day creative work to a flat-rate library; a full exit makes sense only when editorial truly never appears in your briefs. Either way, download and file your licence history before the term ends.
From Pexels
There is nothing to cancel and nothing to migrate — Pexels asks nothing of you, which is its charm. The practical switch is a habit: start new commercial work in a licensed library so the paperwork exists from day one, and keep Pexels for the exploratory phase it is perfect for. Past Pexels downloads remain governed by the Pexels licence as published when you took them; keep a note of source URLs in the project file, as you would for any free asset.
Shutterstock vs Pexels: questions
Which is cheaper, Shutterstock or Pexels?
On the full-access tier this comparison charts, Shutterstock runs Unlimited Plus — $69/mo (annual billing) and Pexels runs Free — $0. Pexels is the cheaper of the two on that basis — but the models differ: Shutterstock — Fragmented by media type: image plans from ~$25–29/mo for 10 downloads (annual); Unlimited Plus at $69/mo annual ($199 monthly) bundles unlimited media with 100 AI credits; standalone GenAI $15/mo; Team around $489/mo; Premier enterprise is custom. Pexels — Free. There is no paid tier: no Pro plan, no extended licence, no indemnification, no teams product. Monetisation is contributors' exposure and Canva's ecosystem.
Which has the bigger library, Shutterstock or Pexels?
Shutterstock claims the larger catalogue. Shutterstock: Reviews put Shutterstock at 600M+ assets including 50M+ editorial images (CreativeVault review, October 2026); other trackers report 450M–700M, so treat the total as a marketing range, not an audited count. Pexels: Pexels Play Store listing reports 3M+ free stock photos and videos (October 2026); web trackers quote higher mixed-media totals. Both figures are the platforms' own claims, not audits — depth in your specific niche matters more than the headline total.
Do Shutterstock or Pexels offer unlimited downloads?
Shutterstock is unlimited only in part (Unlimited Plus tier only, and reviews note a 100 downloads/day cap); Pexels offers unlimited downloads. If unlimited is the deciding factor, check the tier fine print on both — caps and catalogue exclusions are where "unlimited" goes to hide.
Shutterstock or Pexels — which should a filmmaker pick?
It follows the work. Shutterstock is agencies and enterprises that need everything — including editorial and 3D — from one vendor, with indemnification to match the risk. Pexels is prototypes, personal projects, mood films and any work where a missing licence record is an acceptable risk. The scorecard above scores the nine categories where they actually differ; the where-they-win lists are written from each platform's own record.
Is there a third option besides Shutterstock and Pexels?
Brollvia, the platform publishing this comparison — declared interest, stated plainly. Pro is $15/mo or $99/yr, unlimited across video, photos, music and SFX. On this dataset it fully offers what neither of these two does: MCP server for AI agents, Script-to-B-roll, Editor panels/plugins (Premiere), Editor panels/plugins (Resolve), Public licence verification, Curated packs. Its honest weakness is catalogue scale: it is a new contributor library and publishes no comparable total. The full Brollvia-vs-each head-to-heads are linked at the foot of this page, and each lists that rival's wins too.
Data & sources
Data as of October 2026. Library sizes and prices are each company's own published claims or reputable reviewer reports, attributed in the text — not audited figures. Prices change; verify on the provider's site before budgeting. Found an error? Tell us and we will fix the record and this page with it.
Shutterstock sources
- CreativeVault — Shutterstock review (600M+, indemnification, Create)
- SaaSWorthy — Shutterstock pricing (Unlimited Plus, GenAI)
- Tekpon — Shutterstock Premier enterprise details
Pexels sources
Or skip the shortlist entirely
Start free, upgrade when the work does. Every download writes a licence record you can verify in public.